| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
732
   |
Posted - 2012.09.04 09:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
How about fixing them and giving people a reason to go there.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
732
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 09:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:Frying Doom wrote:How about fixing them and giving people a reason to go there. there are plenty of reasons only problem are the large allaince blocs , they either complete paranoid about letting others in or just use the size of their sov to measure their Epeenwith and do nothing else with it
I am sure if you ask them they will have a perfectly good excuse as to why they feel the need to have a Hummer sized Null sov block.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
762
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 10:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
ISD Praetoxx wrote:Yeep wrote:
Or I guess I could whip out a hulk and do some mining but why should I have to do that? Mining is terrible.
For 0.0 industry to thrive we need to de-couple stations from sov so we can have more than one station per system. We need some way of producing our own lowend minerals in a way that is close to the profit produced by highends to encourage people to actually mine them. And we need more production capacity in player built outposts so that production can keep up with the increased number of players in 0.0 (probably more research too but idgaf).
I can relate to this. Perhaps some sort of 0.0 exclusive mining module that yields far greater amount of lowends mined compared to that mined in highsec? Buff the rorq boosts perhaps or introduce additional mining foreman links to increase lowend yield?
Is it against the rules to insult an ISD member names for suggesting something that would destroy the balance of the games interdependent nature?
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
762
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
ISD Praetoxx wrote:Frying Doom wrote:ISD Praetoxx wrote:Yeep wrote:
Or I guess I could whip out a hulk and do some mining but why should I have to do that? Mining is terrible.
For 0.0 industry to thrive we need to de-couple stations from sov so we can have more than one station per system. We need some way of producing our own lowend minerals in a way that is close to the profit produced by highends to encourage people to actually mine them. And we need more production capacity in player built outposts so that production can keep up with the increased number of players in 0.0 (probably more research too but idgaf).
I can relate to this. Perhaps some sort of 0.0 exclusive mining module that yields far greater amount of lowends mined compared to that mined in highsec? Buff the rorq boosts perhaps or introduce additional mining foreman links to increase lowend yield? Is it against the rules to insult an ISD member by calling them names for suggesting something that would destroy the balance of the games interdependent nature? Constructive criticism is always welcome! Let's leave the name calling out of this. Tell it to my ship if we ever meet in New Eden. 
Ok constructive criticism....
One of the worst ideas I have ever heard.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
765
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Frying Doom wrote:ISD Praetoxx wrote:Yeep wrote:
Or I guess I could whip out a hulk and do some mining but why should I have to do that? Mining is terrible.
For 0.0 industry to thrive we need to de-couple stations from sov so we can have more than one station per system. We need some way of producing our own lowend minerals in a way that is close to the profit produced by highends to encourage people to actually mine them. And we need more production capacity in player built outposts so that production can keep up with the increased number of players in 0.0 (probably more research too but idgaf).
I can relate to this. Perhaps some sort of 0.0 exclusive mining module that yields far greater amount of lowends mined compared to that mined in highsec? Buff the rorq boosts perhaps or introduce additional mining foreman links to increase lowend yield? Is it against the rules to insult an ISD member by calling them names for suggesting something that would destroy the balance of the games interdependent nature? Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me, how else are you going to make it better to mine in dangerous areas without either doing something like this or nerfing highsec mining (which is the same thing)?
The mineral prices in Null were actually pretty good until this year where a lot of people have stated to mine in Null. Unfortunately it is just a function of supply and demand. Doing as that says would destroy the economies in the rest of EvE just to give Null miners a higher reward.
So mining was already better in Null but now people have flooded the market, so you think they should be rewarded more for over supply. Strange I did not hear this view when Hi-sec residents flooded their markets.
Null needs to be fixed first and foremost by altering the rewards from the top down system to the bottom up. But this needs to be made carefully as any alterations could easily result in massive inflation or as has happened a flooding of the market.
But a corp and an alliance should live by its members not gain enough isk to go on forever if all the members left. So as I said bottom up.
As to increased income, with ring mining in the pipes I would like to see it based on the PI system for the reward levels where hi-get the least, lo about middle of the road and Null the most. Industry in Null needs an overhaul but I think that should actually be covered with the POS revamp, so if you want it you can have it if you pay.
As to the mining anoms apparently the amounts of spod need to be reduced to allow for a better profit per hour by Null miners.
Then the null sec Sov system needs an overhaul. Well scrapping completely and a full re-build.
Edit: Damn I was going to say iskies to annoy Lord Zim
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
775
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 03:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:[quote=PeHD0M]Mineral prices? - supply & demand. Stop oversupply.
There is no oversupply, there's a complete lack of demand. Everything is imported from Jita.[/quotes]
I believe he is talking about high-end minerals and yeah they are over supplied as described in the CSM minutes. So many more people are mining in Null now as so the market has collapsed. May I suggest a hulkageddon in Null sec?
Edit: I suppose that would be a Mackaggedon.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
798
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 12:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rats wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Rats wrote:Zim, Kitty Bear, don't make me stop this thread. I will, if you two don't stop acting like children. I'll stop this thread right now, and you can WALK all the way back to GD. Bad copycat. :colbert: hoisted by his own petard I believe the phrase is Tal
There's letters seal'd: and my two schoolfellows,
Whom I will trust as I will adders fang'd,
They bear the mandate; they must sweep my way
And marshal me to knavery. Let it work;
For 'tis the sport to have the enginer
Hoist with his own petard; and 't shall go hard
But I will delve one yard below their mines
And blow them at the moon: O, 'tis most sweet,
When in one line two crafts directly meet.
Just to be anal
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
798
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 12:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rats wrote:lol I hear you like that sort of thing  Tal
Why did I not see that one coming, I must not spend enough time with children
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
| |
|